The production of these objects is undertaken with a specific aim in mind, somebody might visit their local hierophant seeking a blessing, lucky charm, or similar tool to enhance their sexual prowess, protect them in battle or which will ward off evil spirits, in effect transferring their sense of inadequacy, apprehension or anxiety to the objects creator, an authoritarian vessel who absorbs this psychological energy then produces it's mediation in a tangible form.
During this process the object is fashioned so as best to
convey it's ability to achieve it's particular purpose: a protection charm
would be small, versatile and lightweight so as not to impede the wearer; a
dream catcher woven with numerous interlaced strands as any net used for
hunting or fishing; a figurine designed to root out a traitor or thief in the
tribe, would represent a humanoid figure for potential suspects to more easily
identify with it[1].
Employed alongside these more obvious requirements are:
colours with their ascribed mystical properties; materials such as crystals or
stones with their distinctive colouration and 'properties'; a representation
like Rome's Imperial Eagle or part of an actual animal said to contain it's
desirable properties, for instance a Rabbit foot, Eagle feather, Shark teeth,
Rhinoceros horn or Tiger blood; objects of particular shape and form important
to a culture; the inscription of symbols or runes upon an object and so on.
Every potential feature and device is employed to establish
an object's credibility within a hieratic framework, the value of the fetish is
dependent not only upon the certainty their fashioner can project to facilitate
belief in it's efficacy, but also upon an underlying relation to the world and
explanation of it's various phenomena, the rudimentary awareness of which is
exploited in the construction of each particular fetish.
An 18th century bard wrote “my love is like a red
red rose”, a more contemporary bard stated “In every dream home a heartache”,
needless to say in our fascination with the “nice” and revulsion toward the
accurate, the former remains far more popularly known.
The explicit objects of identification in each religious
ideology differ, the implicit truth of our submission to an oppressive external
hierarchy permeates them all, as W. Mcgaffey states of the Congo ritual system:
“Fetishism' is about relations among people, rather than the objects that
mediate and disguise those relations.”
Even words such as truth, freedom, love, power, success, or
knowledge; general concepts, slogans or phrases, through repetition become
fetishized objects people feel and are encouraged to believe are essential, for
the navigation of a world still steeped in no small amount of error.
Like the Congolese Warriors encountered by Che Guevara while
combating Imperialist forces in Africa, who, being equipped only with Mulele Water (or Dawa Potion) from
their castes of holy men; fetishes designed to deflect bullets; and no
small measure of credulity, being thus convinced of their invulnerability ran
blindly into battle towards their own destruction. A person clothing themselves
in certain symbols, phrases, ideas or slogans; who believes they possess
bravery, beauty, knowledge or truth; who has been convinced they are honest,
pure, attractive, funny or pious; or who has obtained some object embodying one
or more of these attributes, can derive from these symbolic forms no small
measure of confidence in their efficacy.
These fetish objects are effective in proportion to the
amount of certainty the individual selling them -the shaman, psychic, priest,
salesman, seducer, teacher or political leader- can project. Their social prestige, the purely contingent validation of it's owners confidence in them, and perpetual affirmation of a range of fetishes' efficacy in hierarchical human culture throughout history. [1.1]
'Beautiful' feelings are taken as arguments in themselves; the 'sustaining breast' as the bellows of divinity, and mere conviction as the criterion of 'truth'.
'Beautiful' feelings are taken as arguments in themselves; the 'sustaining breast' as the bellows of divinity, and mere conviction as the criterion of 'truth'.
By the puritanical preacher inspiring enough 'faith' amongst
his congregation, even the convoluted doctrines of the New Testament can
become, if not convincing then certainly emotionally rousing, this is why
advertising companies and public image gurus are employed by corporations and
individuals, to inspire confidence in certain products, ideas or marketable
commodities for a considerable fee.
Taken at superficially appealing face value then eventually
being adopted by multitudes, fetishized ideas, explanations, objects or
factitiously constructed 'realities' become irresistible, particularly when the
tension between their demonstration by one and absence for another, becomes
unbearable to the unconscious of the latter.
This is due not only to the natural human desire to 'fit-in',
our inherent susceptibility to persuasion, taste for novelty and fear of
alienation, but is facilitated by coercive behaviour such as psychological or
physical bullying and manipulation, often unconsciously seeking to enforce
one's own adherence to cultural 'norms' by attacking those of others, or in the
case of religious morality; attacking and debasing a people's very nature to
coerce their conformity.
A concept, slogan or phrase general enough to superficially
appeal to and be adopted by as many people as possible such as: “faith is
good”; “doubt is bad”; “economic growth”; “technological progress”; “the poor
are feckless and indolent”; or “the rich are greedy and ruthless”; “love is all
you need”, like any material objects believed to be endowed with 'mystical'
power, may create a perpetual feedback loop, becoming self referential
'truths'[2], first hierarchically bestowed then reinforced through repetition,
they become socially enforced overtly and implicitly.
These reified concepts mediate and determine our social
relations and interactions with the world, giving shape to the unconscious
desires, drives and actions which constitute our activity, have you heard
somebody say “I want happiness”, or “I want love”, then seen their life become
a constant process of acquisition, an eternal recurrence of aspiration,
attainment and disillusionment?
These are merely ways of expressing an otherwise undetermined
urge through language, giving these deep, instinctual aspects of our nature an
outlet in consciousness, the power lies in defining the content of these terms,
determining what they actually represent or mean, their relevance to our
individual lives.
One can be active about this process, or passively accept the
multitudinous versions created, reproduced or marketed for consumers at
considerable financial and 'spiritual' cost.
As Joseph Geobbals so adequately demonstrated in Germany during the
1930' and 40's;“[propaganda] must make use of painting in black-and-white,
since otherwise it cannot be convincing to people”, an object's ease of availability,
it's effortless adoption by the widest number of people is what matters, the
confidence a particular fetish inspires, not it's factual accuracy,
authenticity or ability to fulfil claims made about it, indeed many modern
consumables are produced so as to be insufficient to requirements, thereby
instituting not only a cycle of submission to the consumption of constantly
emerging reproductions, but also an implicit justification for the unrelenting
production of 'needs'.
Like the shipwrecked sailor driven to drink the sea water
surrounding him to quench his thirst, these superficially appealing constructs
merely exasperate our situation.
As this becomes ever more apparent; the gap between the attainment of our 'desires' and our inevitable dissatisfaction narrows, is it any surprise that religious fundamentalism; the conspiracy cult of easy answers; fetishism of nations, sovereignty, the economy; and other manifestations of black and white thinking are enjoying such a resurgence amidst this degeneration?
Advertising agencies as previously mentioned exist not only
to appeal to, but also to produce human needs; utilizing the social
technological mediums available, their audio-visual productions are designed to
captivate and transfix the viewer upon certain things that they lack all the
better if these are entirely non-existent: the need to get ahead of the curve;
the need to be more connected; the need to go faster, be fitter, stronger,
better looking; to be loved; to gain enlightenment; inner peace ad infinitum,
thereby affirming the sense of inadequacy, apprehension or anxieties, which
channel people towards perpetual passive consumption of various products
designed to 'save' us.
Those skilled in the marketing of conceptual or physical
objects, are fundamentally indebted to the advancements made in psychological
research -which advanced our understanding of the unconscious nature of human
beings- during the 20th century, whether that knowledge was given
freely, taken or earned, it is unfortunately overwhelmingly employed in
manipulating and further enslaving, rather than empowering those who don't have
it.
The theologians of the numerous cults of easy answers are
well aware of the same techniques, “What's that, you lack understanding of an
often incomprehensible world?
Here, have mine.... It will only cost you one mortal soul”.
Constructed fetish objects; the symbols, become mistaken for
the things they are intended to signify, in the case of the dream catcher it is
the owners subconscious temporarily convinced and put at rest, rather than the
efficacy of the object itself, the consumer of a particular brand of deodorant,
feeling confidence in his appeal to the olfactory nerves of the opposite sex
may exude this confidence, which -rather than how an individual smells- is what
appeals to the target audience.
The object or symbol in question, merely provides a framework
or container in which various fears and desires can be expressed, it mediates
the existence of these uncomfortable aspects of human consciousness, and
temporarily allays them for as long as it takes for the next 'stop-gap' to
arrive.
______
[1] In the Congolese system and what are known as Voodoo
dolls this included sticking pins into the doll and gauging the response of
potential suspects, demonstrating the painful torturous punishments they might
experience when found out, the idea being that guilt would manifest in a wince,
panic or even pain where the object representing the guilty party has been
pierced.
[1.1] For example astrology, christianity, numerology, etc etc.
[2] This is a logical fallacy “appeal to popularity”: a thing
widely valued becomes established as 'politically correct', can be considered
right regardless of it's factual accuracy merely by the absence of criticism,
sometimes, as in the case of Stalinist Russia or Nazi Germany criticism being
violently suppressed but more often drowned out by the infatuation of the
masses.
[3] 'Joseph Goebbels'
Principles of Propaganda', by Leonard W. Doob
No comments:
Post a Comment